JYOTI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210 CWP-151-2020 (O & M) Date of decision: 15.07.2026 JYOTI ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. H.S.Kasan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Paramjit Singh, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate, for respondent No.3-HSAMB. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel refers to the written statement to contend that allocation of the departments has been done as per the merit alphabetically, a criteria which has been adopted vide resolution dated 20.08.2019, which has not been challenged by the petitioner even in the instant petition, in view of which his learned counsel prays for withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file a representation which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the aforesaid. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. In case, the petitioner submits the representation within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously. 15.07.2026 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasone