Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-14

JATIN MUNGA @ TRENDI @ JATIN MOGA vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 24431/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
JATIN MUNGA @ TRENDI @ JATIN MOGA
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-24431-2026 (O&M) -:1:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (221) CRM-M-24431-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:14.07.2026 JATIN MUNGA @ TRENDI @ JATIN MOGA … Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ... Respondent -.- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Anmol Puri, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Navreet Kaur, AAG, Punjab. -.- VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition, being the first under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973), has been preferred seeking the concession of regular bail during the pendency of trial in FIR No. 155 dated 27.07.2024, registered under Sections 109, 351(2), 191(3) and 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Sections 307, 506, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860), along with Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, at Police Station Sadar Khanna, District Ludhiana. 2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that the present FIR came to be registered on the statement of the complainant, Manvir Singh, who alleged that on 27.07.2024, while he, along with his friends, was returning from the volleyball gr