Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-15

JATIN KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 34834/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
JATIN KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-34834-2026 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 105 CRM-M-34834-2026 Date of Decision:-15.07.2026 Jatin Kumar. ......Petitioner. Vs. State of Haryana. ......Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present:- Mr. Neeraj Sansaniwal, Advocate & Mr. Sumer Khod, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG Haryana. *** RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the present petition, the petitioner prays for interim regular bail for a period of 02 months in case bearing FIR No.363 dated 26.09.2025 under Section 109(1), 132, 121(1), 221, 3(5) of BNS and Section 25(1-B)(a) of Arms Act registered at P.S. Rajendra Park, Gurugram. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has inter alia argued that the petitioner sustained gunshot injury on his leg/knee in the alleged encounter allegedly taking place on 26.09.2025 which gave birth to the above mentioned FIR; that consequent thereto, the petitioner was shifted to a hospital and was subjected to treatment/surgical intervention and metallic plates/rods were implanted in his knee joint coupled with multiple external VINAY MAHAJAN 2026.07.15 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this docum