HARDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

REEMA SAINI 2026.07.15 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh 2 CRM-M-25787 of 2026(O&M) No.2, however, failed to abide by terms and conditions of the compromise. She neither filed the petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, nor returned the gold articles to the petitioner, as agreed. Therefore, the order of anticipatory bail was liable to be cancelled. 3. FIR was registered on statement of the petitioner, who alleged that he was married to Rajanbir Kaur on 06.07.2025 as per Sikh rites and rituals. After some days, his wife started quarrelling with him and his family. On 08.11.2025, when he was away with his parents to Gurudwara Shri Fatehgarh Sahib for paying obeisance, his wife was alone at home. When they returned, she was found missing. She had taken all gold ornaments from the almirah weighing 6 tolas, apart from cash of Rs. 2 lacs, alongwith Karan son of her paternal aunt. 4. The principal of law well established by a line of precedents is that concession of liberty once granted is not to be withdrawn unless there is compelling justification there for. In Crl. Appeal No. 2381 of 2025, decided on 02.05.2025, titled S