HANIF MOHAMMAD @ HONEY vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRWP-6462-2026 1 115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6462-2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 HANIF MOHAMMAD @ HONEY ......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of appropriate directions to the respondent-authorities not to harass, threaten, or falsely implicate the petitioner in any criminal proceedings arising out of the interview in question. 2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner confined the relief sought in the present petition to a direction for consideration of the representation dated 21.05.2026 (Annexure P-8). 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 5. Learned State counsel submits, on instructions, that the representation dated 21.05.2026 (Annexure P-8) has already been SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.16 18:52 I attest to the accuracy an