GURPEET SINGH @ BEERA vs STATE OF PUNJAB

REEMA SAINI 2026.07.17 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh 2 CRM-M-14907 of 2026 (O&M) also suffered a cut on his hand. The cause of dispute was a motor connection. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was initially allowed regular bail vide order dated 24.09.2025 of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Baghapurana. The order of regular bail was, however, cancelled by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Baghapurana on 21.11.2025 pursuant to which petitioner surrendered in the Court and was in custody since then. Investigation of the case was complete. Challan had been presented. Co-accused Manjit Kaur had been allowed anticipatory bail vide order dated 12.09.2025. Petitioner had no criminal antecedents and the dispute occurred as complainant, who was unhappy with marriage of the petitioner with the Scheduled Cast lady, abused the petitioner and his wife. 4. Learned State counsel assisted by Mr. Surinder Garg, learned counsel for complainant opposes the prayer for regular bail arguing that gandasi blow inflicted by the petitioner had severed thumb of the complainant, his real brother. An application for i