GURMAIL; KAUR vs P.O.LABOUR COURT,BHATINDA AND ANOTHER

2026:PHHC a | IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (208) CWP No. 3713 of 2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.7.2026 Gurmail Kaur sve Petitioner Versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bathinda .....Respondents and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Ms. Suverna Mutneja, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) for the petitioner. Mr. Luvinder Sofat, Sr, DAG, Punjab. None for respondent No. 2. eek KIRTI SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite of making best efforts, they failed to contact their client to get required instructions to plead the case on her behalf. 2. In these circumstances, this Court is unable to proceed further for the purpose of hearing of the present petition and left with no other option except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want or prosecution. 4. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for seeking revival of the present writ petition, within a period of four weeks from today, in case any substantive issue still exists along with a cause of action to the petitioner. 5. Pending application(s),