GULAB SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 215 CWP-21837-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 14.07.2026 Gulab Singh … Pe oner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Parveen Moudgil, Advocate for the pe oner. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana. ***** NIDHI GUPTA, J. Present Civil Writ Pe on under Ar cles 226 of the Cons tu on of India has been filed by the pe oner for issuance of a writ in the nature of Cer orari quashing the impugned orders dated 30.10.2019 (Annexure P-2) and 08.09.2020 (Annexure P-6); and a writ in the nature of Mandamus direc ng the respondents to grant the pe oner 1st ACP w.e.f. 01.08.2016 instead of 01.01.2017; with all consequen al benefits, including the benefit of re-exercise of op on under the HCS (ACP) Rules, 2016, in terms of le ers dated 16.06.2017 (Annexure P-3) and 08.06.2020 (Annexure P-4). 2. It is inter alia submi ed by ld. counsel for the pe oner that vide order dated 29.07.2008 pe oner was appointed as Conductor in the respondent-Department of Transport, State of Haryana. Services of the NEELAM KUMARI 2026.07.16 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab an