GOPI KRISHAN KHANNA vs STATE OF HARYANA

RFA-889-1994 & RFA-931-1994 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 (2 cases) RFA-889-1994 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 Gopi Krishan Khanna …Appellant Versus State of Haryana …Respondent And RFA-931-1994 Shakuntla Nagpal …Appellant Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate Ms. Indu Bala, Advocate and Mr. Vinayak Atri, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Abhinash Jain, Additional Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. As common issues are involved in the captioned appeals, with the consent of both sides, the same are hereby disposed of by this common order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, facts are borrowed from RFA No.889 of 1994. 2. The appellant through instant appeal is seeking setting aside of award dated 04.01.1994 whereby learned Additional District Judge, Panipat MOHIT KUMAR 2026.07.13 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RFA-889-1994 & RFA-931-1994 -2- has rejected his claim for compensation under Section 48 and 48A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘1894 Act’). 3. The State Government issued notification under S