EHC RAMESH CHANDER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 214 CWP-9065-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.07.2026 EHC RAMESH CHANDER ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate and Mr. Viransh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel states that allegations against EASI Krishan was identical as to the petitioner, however, he has been only given warning while petitioner has been awarded penalty of stoppage of 5 increments with permanent effect. In this regard, he relies on Man Singh vs. State of Haryana and others, 2008(3) SCT 364. He, on instructions, thus, prays that his case be reconsidered and decided in light thereof, in a time bound manner. 2. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the matter will be reconsidered and decided, within a period of 6 months, in accordance with law, taking note of the aforesaid submissions and judgment, uninfluenced by the orders impugned in the present case, which this Court has no reason to believe