BIRMATI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 122 RSA-2643-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.07.2026 Birmati . . . . Appellant Vs. State of Haryana and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA **** Present: - None for the appellant. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. On 07.11.2025, the following order was passed: - “There is no compliance of the order dated 01.04.2025 passed by this Court. Today none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. Last opportunity is granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to comply with the aforesaid order failing which the present regular second appeal shall be dismissed for non-prosecution. List on 18.05.2026.” 3. Despite the aforesaid order granting last opportunity to the appellant to make compliance of the previous order dated 01.04.2025, nobody is putting in appearance on behalf of the appellant. 4. The aforesaid facts clearly indicate that appellants are no longer interested in pursuing the appeal. As such, the same is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecution. (DEEPAK GUPTA) 13.07.2026 JUDGE Vivek Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes