BHURRO AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRWP-8464-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.07.2026 BHURRO AND ANOTHER …PETITIONERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Munfaid Khan, Advocate for Mr. Hukam Singh, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana. **** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J. (Oral) The criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks a direction to official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of the private respondents No.4 to 8. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Mool Chand, submits that on receipt of representation Annexure P3, statements of both petitioners were recorded that they did not perceive any threat from private respondents, whereafter the representation was consigned. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that in view of stance of the State, the petition may be disposed of. Since, threat to the petitioners does not survive, the petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 17.07.2026 JUDGE Sumit Singla Whether speak