BALU & ORS. vs STATE OF HARYANA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109 RFA-2263-1999 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 Balu and others …Appellants Versus State of Haryana …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - None for the appellants Mr. Abhinash Jain, Additional Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. There was no representation of the appellants on 02.12.2025 and 14.01.2026. As per office report, notice was sent to the appellants and service is complete. 2. Despite notice, there is no representation on the behalf of the appellants. It appears that with the efflux of time, the appellants have lost their interest to pursue the matter. 3. In the backdrop, the appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution, however, liberty is granted to move an appropriate application within 6 months, if cause survives. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 14.07.2026 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2026.07.14 17:58 Whether reportable Yes/No I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.