Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-16

BALDEV RAJ ARORA vs JAGDISH CHANDER GUPTA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
RSA 3046/2023
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
BALDEV RAJ ARORA
Respondent
JAGDISH CHANDER GUPTA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

RSA-3046-2023 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3046-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.07.2026 Baldev Raj Arora ...Appellant Versus Jagdish Chander Gupta and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Ms. Parbeen Kumari, Advocate for Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Advocate for the appellant. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by the plain6ffs-appellant(s) assailing the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by both the Courts below. 2. The appellants had ins6tuted a suit for possession along with the consequen6al relief of permanent injunc6on in respect of the property in dispute. The said suit came to be dismissed by the learned trial Court vide judgment & decree dated 03.04.2006. Aggrieved there-against, the appellants preferred a first appeal, which too was dismissed by the learned First Appellate Court vide judgment and decree dated 31.01.2012, affirming the findings recorded by the trial Court. 3. The present Regular Second Appeal has been ins6tuted in September, 2023. The appeal is accompanied by CM-10864-C-2023 under Sec6on 5 of the Limita6on Act seeking condona6on of delay of 2870 days