Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-14

ARVIND SHARMA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 36637/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ARVIND SHARMA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-36637-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 239 CRM-M-36637-2026 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 ARVIND SHARMA ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate and Mr. Pradeep Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1. This is the second petition seeking regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (439 Cr.P.C.) in FIR No.296 dated 20.8.2025, under section 318(4), 61(2) of BNS, 2023 (420, 120-B IPC), Section 66D of IT Act, registered at Police Station, Cyber Crime East, District Gurugram. 2. The case of the prosecution is that complainant Shakuntla Gulia made a complaint regarding fraudulent siphoning of Rs.1.46 crores via fake investment platform "PTUdry.com". The allegations against the petitioner are that during the course of investigation, beneficiary accounts were located and an amount of Rs. 52 lakhs was stated to have been received in the account of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and has not committed any offence. He furt