Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-16

ARUN @ ARUN KUMAR @ ARUN THAKUR vs UT OF CHANDIGARH

Citation / case number
CRM-M 36134/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ARUN @ ARUN KUMAR @ ARUN THAKUR
Respondent
UT OF CHANDIGARH
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM M-36134 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 CRM M-36134 of 2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 Arun @ Arun Kumar @ Arun Thakur ...Petitioner Versus State of Union Territory, Chandigarh ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT Present : Mr. Akshit Grover, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Avneet, APP, for U.T., Chandigarh. N.S.SHEKHAWAT, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 with a prayer to grant regular bail in case FIR No.172 dated 13.12.2025, registered under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Sections 420 and 34 of IPC, 1860) and Section 24 of the Immigration Act, 1983, at Police Station Central, Sector-17, Chandigarh. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the complainants had allegedly deposited the money with an immigration company under the name and style M/s the Setup World Travel and, AMIT RANA 2026.07.17 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judgement/order CRM M-36134 of 2026 -2- thereafter, the visas or air tickets, which were allegedly supplied to the complainants, were found to be forged and fabricated