Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-07-01

ARTI VARUN KEJRIWAL AND 5 ORS vs VANDANA VINAY AWATRAMANI AND 7 ORS

Citation / case number
IA/989/2026 (29)
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
ARTI VARUN KEJRIWAL AND 5 ORS
Respondent
VANDANA VINAY AWATRAMANI AND 7 ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CNR No : HCBM020269412025 IA/989/2026 Arti Vs. Vandana IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION 3. Mr. Haresh Jagtiani, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms. Janhavi Vora for Defendant no. 4. Mr. Aniket Malu (through V.C.) for Defendant no. 6. Mr. Karl Tamboly a/w. Mr. Biswadeep Chakravarty for Defendant no. 7. Mr. Rumi Mirza a/w Ms. Devika Kamble i/b. Dipesh Mehta & Associates for Defendant nos. 8 and 9. __________________________________________________________________ CORAM : FARHAN P. DUBASH, J. RESERVED ON : 1st APRIL 2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 1st JULY 2026 ORDER: 1. By the present Suit, the Plaintiffs seek various reliefs including, inter alia, a declaration that certain properties constitute the assets of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) of their common ancestor, late Jotumal Awatramani, described as “Jotumal and Sons HUF” (hereinafter referred to as the “Jotumal HUF”). The Plaintiffs further seek a declaration that certain other properties are the self-acquired properties of their deceased mother, late ------------------------------------- Order dated 1st July 2026 IA/989/2026 Arti Vs. Vandana Veena Awatramani (late Veena). Both sets of properties are de

ARTI VARUN KEJRIWAL AND 5 ORS vs VANDANA VINAY AWATRAMANI AND 7 ORS · Niyam