ANJU KUMARI AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

MUKESH KUMAR SALUJA 2026.07.17 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRWP-8471-2026 -2- 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Sirsa is directed to depute a senior police officer to look into the representation (Annexure P-4) and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate orders, in accordance with law. 7. This order shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any. 8. With these observations, this petition is disposed of. 17.07.2026 (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) mks JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES / NO Whether Reportable: YES / NO MUKESH KUMAR SALUJA 2026.07.17 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh