AMIT YADAV vs STATE OF HARYANA

109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-50358-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:16.07.2026 Amit Yadav …Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Advocate Mr. Anil Singh Rathore, Advocate Mr. Pulkit Mago, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant regular bail to him in case FIR No.264, dated 26.07.2023, registered under Sections 302,201 of IPC, at Police Station Sadar Ballabgarh, District Faridabad (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that from a bare perusal of the FIR (Annexure P-1), it is apparent that the petitioner was not named initially as an accused. However, later on, the supplementary statement of the complainant was recorded and the petitioner was nominated as an accused in the present case. Further, the case of the prosecution is based on circumstantial evidence and the chain of circumstances, projected by the prosecution, itself proves that the petitioner had not commi