Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-14

AMIT vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 13364/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
AMIT
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-13364-2026 (O&M) -1- 222 monroe en IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13364-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 Amit ...Petitioner vs. State of Haryana ...Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Robin Singh Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Senior DAG, Haryana. 22K 2K N.S.Shekhawat J. 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short BNSS, 2023) [prior Section 439 of Cr.P.C.] with a prayer to grant regular bail to him in case FIR No.292 dated 25.06.2014, registered under Sections 307, 34 of Indian Penal Code [corresponding Sections 109, 3(5) of Bharatiya Nytaya Sanhita, 2023] and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Kharkhoda, District Sonipat. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely involved in the present case due to some old rivalry. Learned counsel further submits that FIR was registered on 25.06.2014 and the petitioner was wrongly declared as a proclaimed offender on 30.04.2015, however, he was subsequently arrested by the police on 21.01.2025 and is in custody for the last