Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-16

AMAN vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 38295/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
AMAN
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-38295-2026(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (157) CRM-M-38295-2026(O&M) Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 Aman ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Rahul Sangwan, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. R.K. Ambavta, DAG, Haryana. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) for quashing of the order dated 30.09.2024 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panipat, whereby the petitioner has been declared as a Proclaimed Person in case FIR No. 27 dated 03.02.2021 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC (corresponding to Sections 318, 338(5), 336(3), 340 of BNS) and Section 61 of the Excise Act, registered at Police Station Ishrana, District Panipat, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was regularly appearing before the trial Court. However, due to his permanent shifting of residence along with his family to