Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-13

ABDUL GANI vs FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE PUNJAB & ANR

Citation / case number
CWP 3582/2017
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ABDUL GANI
Respondent
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE PUNJAB & ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-3582-2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 CWP-3582-2017 Date of decision : 13.07.2026 Abdul Gani ...... Petitioner versus Financial Commissioner Revenue, Punjab and anr. ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. A.K. Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.P.S. Ishar, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Ms. Muskan Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Ishan Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari seeking quashing of the orders dated 21.05.2012, 28.11.2013 and 01.08.2016. 2. It is not disputed that respondent No.2 who was appointed as Lambardar, vis-a-vis the present petitioner, has died during the pendency of the writ petition. After his death, new process has been initiated. 3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that though process was initiated, but the petitioner did not apply as he was sanguine that he will succeed in the present writ petition. 4. Once the petitioner has not applied, he has taken a risk at his DINESH KUMAR 2026.07.15 16:42 own cost. I attest to the accuracy and in