Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-20

WRIT - C No. 89 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 89 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 89 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

A.F.R. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 89 of 2026 Janki Prasad and 9 others …..Petitioner(s) Versus Distt. Registrar/ Addl. District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue Ambedkar Nagar and 2 others …..Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar, Virendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Om Prakash Nag Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri S.K. Khare, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Sri Yogesh Singh, the learned counsel for the opposite party no.3, who has filed a short counter affidavit, which is taken on record. 2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have challenged the validity of a judgment and order dated 10.10.2025, passed by the District Registrar/Additional District Magistrate, Finance and Revenue, Ambedkar Nagar in Case No.896 of 2022, under Section 72/73 of Registration Act, 1908. 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that a registered agreement was executed by the petitioner nos.1 to 4 and Shambhunath, the predecessor of 2 WRIC No. - 89 of 2026

WRIT - C No. 89 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam