Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-27

WRIT - C No. 89 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 89 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 89 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 89 of 2026 Ram Lal Jayan (Village Pradhan) .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P., And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahadeo Singh Chandel Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. The present petition has been filed by the Village Pradhan by private counsel. 2. After going through the averments made in the writ petition, the Court is of the prima facie opinion that the writ petition filed by a private counsel is not maintainable and that too without taking prior approval from the District Collector. 3. At this stage, a prayer has been made by Sri M. S. Chandel, learned counsel for the petitioner to dismiss present writ petition as not pressed with liberty to file fresh writ petition. 4. Prayer made is allowed. 5. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed. (Prakash Padia,J.) January 27, 2026 Pramod Tripathi Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

WRIT - C No. 89 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam