Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-21

WRIT - C No. 545 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 545 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 545 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 545 of 2026 Madan Mohan And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jay Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 & 2. 2. The petitioners have preferred the present petition inter-alia with the prayer to direct the Court below i.e., Respondent No.2 to decide the Appeal No.401 of 2025, being Computer No. C202501000000401 (Rameshwer Singh and others vs. Smt. Kamlesh and others) under Section 333 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition, within stipulated period.. 3. Very recently Hon'ble Apex Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No(s). 38375 of 2023 (Mohd. Faiyaz Khan vs. State of U.P. and others) passed an order on 27.09.2023 stating therein that unless the situation is extraordinary, the Court should not direct any Court to decide any pending case in a time-bound manner. The order dated 27.09.2023 is quoted hereinbelow :- "Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Unless the situation is extraordinary, this Court s

WRIT - C No. 545 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam