WRIT - C No. 536 of 2026 at Lucknow

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 536 of 2026 Mohd.Lais Pathan .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Urban Develoment Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivam Srivastava, Mohit Singh, Rahul Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Krishana Kumar Singh Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Shri Shivam Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Krishana Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition being aggrieved by oral directions of opposite party no. 3 and the officials working under him for removal of alleged encroachment by the petitioner, though, according to him, there is no encroachment. 3. Shri K.K. Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3 says that there is encroachment on public street and on a survey, the encroachers have been orally asked to remove the encroachments, however, no action is being taken as of now and will be taken only as per statute. 4. In this context the petitioner's counsel ref