Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-20

WRIT - C No. 383 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 383 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 383 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 383 of 2026 Tahira Bano .....Petitioner(s) Versus Vijay Singh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Singh Kushwaha, Sushil Kumar Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. The order dated 13.09.2024 by which restoration application filed by the respondent no.1-Vijay Singh was allowed as well as order dated 24.09.2025 passed by the respondent no.3-Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil-Aliganj, District Etah passed in the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 35 (2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 are under challenge in the present writ petition. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel that against the order dated 24.09.2025 statutory alternative remedy is available to the petitioner to file a revision before the Board of Revenue or before the Commissioner, concerned, as provided under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 3. Since statutory alternative remedy is available to the petitioner to file a revision as provided under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the present writ petition is dismissed. (Prakash Padia,

WRIT - C No. 383 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam