Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-22

WRIT - C No. 352 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 352 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 352 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 352 of 2026 Urmila Saxena .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Govt. Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prateek Shrivastava, Amar Jeet Yadav, Anand Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., I.M. Pandey Ist, M.K. Dixit Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Instructions filed today is taken on record. 2. None is present for the petitioner. 3. According to the instructions received by Sri Rajesh Tewari, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the State the land in question is non-Z.A. land, meaning thereby, the State does not have any control over it. It is a private land, therefore, the pond existing thereon, if any, is also a private pond. 4. The petition is dismissed in default. (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) January 22, 2026 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

WRIT - C No. 352 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam