Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-20

WRIT - C No. 327 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 327 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 327 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 327 of 2026 Ashutosh Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Indra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. List of fresh cases has been revised but nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner though learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel for respondent No.4 are present. 2. Today when the matter is taken up, a preliminary objection has been raised by learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioner is a complainant and the present petition on behalf of the complainant is not maintainable. 3. Since nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed in default. (Prakash Padia,J.) January 20, 2026 saqlain Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

WRIT - C No. 327 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam