Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-29
WRIT - C No. 3178 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Citation / case number
- WRIT - C No. 3178 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Court
- Allahabad High Court
- Petitioner
- WRIT - C No. 3178 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Respondent
- Unknown
Judgment text excerpt
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 3178 of 2026 Ritesh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankit Kumar Singh, Ram Naresh Nigam, Ritesh Singh, Suresh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite party to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite party feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present writ petition is to direct the Respondent No.2 i.e., Nayab Tehsildar, Khoravar, Tehsil Sadar, District Gorakhpur to decide the Case No.13255 of 2023, Computerized Case No. T202305310313255 (Ritesh Yadav vs. Surendra Yadav) under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within stipulated period. 4. It is argued by the counsel for the petitioner that as per provisions contained under sub-rule (7) of Rules 34 of the U.P. Revenu