Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-29

WRIT - C No. 2858 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 2858 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 2858 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 2858 of 2026 Ram Autar Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus Devesh Kumar Singh Chauhan And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Radhamani Saxena Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shyam Mani Shukla Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has preferred the present petition inter alia with the prayer to direct the Respondent No.7 namely Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, District Moradabad to decide the Execution Application dated 08.07.2025 filed by the petitioner in Suit No.3434 of 2023, in accordance with U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, in accordance with the judgment dated 19.05.2023 passed in the matter of Daya Shanker Versus State of U.P. reported in 2023 (6) ADJ 181, within stipulated period. 3. It is argued that the execution application is pending consideration, but till date no decision has been taken, hence the present writ petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance upon a judgement of the Supreme Court in the case of Rahul S. Shah Vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi and Ors reported in AIR 2021 SC 2161. 5. It is argued by counsel for the petit

WRIT - C No. 2858 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam