Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-30

WRIT - C No. 2090 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 2090 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 2090 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 2090 of 2026 Bachai Urf Kadedeen Dwivedi .....Petitioner(s) Versus Apar Ayukt Nyayik Prayagraj And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite party to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite party feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent No.1/Additional Commissioner Judicial Prayagraj Region Prayagraj to decide Revision No.00910 of 2018 (Computer Case No.C201802000000910) (Tribhuvan Nath Urf Bachai Vs. Kadedeen and others) expeditiously. 4. The matter is pending before the Court below since long and considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter. 5. In the facts and circumstances

WRIT - C No. 2090 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam