Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-30

WRIT - C No. 2047 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 2047 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 2047 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 2047 of 2026 Rammurat .....Petitioner(s) Versus Additional Commissioner Judicial Prayagraj And 13 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the private respondent to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the private respondent feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that statutory appeal being Appeal No.608 of 2021 (Computerized Case No.C202102000000608) (Ram Surat Vs. Radhye Shyam) which is still pending consideration before the respondent No.1/Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Prayagraj Division Prayagraj for last more than four years. It is argued that considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no decision has been taken in the matter. 4. Heard

WRIT - C No. 2047 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam