Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-19

WRIT - C No. 184 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 184 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 184 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 184 of 2026 Sunita .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Gupta, Prashant Kumar, Rajendra Kumar Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondent/respondents to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the respondent/respondents feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent no.2-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil-Karchhana, District Prayagraj to decide the appeal being Case No.5486 of 2025 (Computer Case No.T202514360205486) expeditiously. 4. It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that though a considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the pr

WRIT - C No. 184 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam