Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-21

WRIT - C No. 1809 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1809 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1809 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 1809 of 2026 Baburam .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the private respondent to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the private respondent feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent No.2/Additional Commissioner (Judicial)-II, Bareilly Division, Bareilly to decide Appeal No.1351/2024 (Computerized Case No.C202412000001351) (Baburam Vs. State of U.P. and others) expeditiously. 4. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is pending before the respondent No.2 since long and considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter. 5. In the

WRIT - C No. 1809 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam