WRIT - C No. 1804 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 1804 of 2026 Rajesh Kumar Jaishwal .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mayank Mohan Dutt Mishra, Sudhanshu Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner/petitioners seeking the following relief:- "A. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 2, Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil-Barhaj, District Deoria to decide the mutation Case being Computerised Case No. T202405200402806) (Sunita vs. Parvati) and connected Computerised Case No. T202405200402275) (Sunita vs. Parvati) u/s. 34/35 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within some stipulated period." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/petitioners submits that the power to mutate on the basis of succession flows from under Section 33 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and is to be exercised in the manner prescribed by Section 35. It is further guided by Rule 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Code Rules, 2016. Reference may also be made to sub R