Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-21

WRIT - C No. 1749 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1749 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1749 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 1749 of 2026 Sandhya Devi And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Km. Anjana Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner/petitioners seeking the following relief:- "i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 2 to decide the Case No. 8439/2022 (Computerized Case No. T202205310308439 (Sandhya Vs. Janardan Singh) u/s 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending in the Court of Tehsildar, Tehsil- Sadar, District-Gorakhpur within some stipulated period." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/petitioners submits that the power to mutate on the basis of succession flows from under Section 33 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and is to be exercised in the manner prescribed by Section 35. It is further guided by Rule 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Code Rules, 2016. Reference may also be made to sub Rule (7) of Rule 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code

WRIT - C No. 1749 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam