Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-21

WRIT - C No. 1702 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1702 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1702 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 1702 of 2026 Hare Krishna Movement Vrindavan Through Its Vice President .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dwijendra Prasad, Pradyumna Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-Respondents and Shri Avinash Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.5. 2. The only prayer made by the petitioner in the present writ petition to direct the Respondent No.2- Additional Commissioner, Judicial Ist, Agra Division, Agra to decide Revision No.1564 of 2016 (State of U.P. and others vs. Hare Krishna Movement Vrindavan) under Section 333 of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 filed by the respondent No.4 within stipulated period. 3. It is argued that the aforesaid revision is pending consideration for last more than 9 years and considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no decision has been taken, hence the present writ petition. 4. Heard counsel for the parties present and peru

WRIT - C No. 1702 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam