Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-21

WRIT - C No. 1693 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1693 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1693 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 1693 of 2026 Nandlal And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 20 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 & 2 and Shri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.3. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed today, notices need not be issued to the private-respondents. 3. The only prayer made by the petitioner in the present writ petition to direct the Respondent No.2- Additional Commissioner, (Administration), Azamgarh Division, Azamgarh to decide the Revision No.201/B of 2019, Computerized Case No.C201915000001035 (Nandlal and others vs. Shrinath and others) under Section 333 of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 within stipulated period. 4. It is argued that considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no decision has been taken, hence the present writ petition. 5. Heard counsel for the parties present and perused the record. 6. With th

WRIT - C No. 1693 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam