Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-21

WRIT - C No. 1668 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1668 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1668 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 1668 of 2026 Kaushal Kumar Pandey @ Kaushal Kishor Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 19 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that against the order dated 12.08.2025 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar Gorakhpur, the petitioner has preferred statutory No.2101 of 2025 (Computer case No.C202505000002101) (Kaushal Kumar Pandey @ Kaushal Kishor and others Vs. Aniruddha Rai and others) under section 24 (4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 along with stay application has been filed before the respondent No.2/Commissioner Gorakhpur Division Gorakhpur. It is argued that the stay application of the petitioner has been rejected by the respondent No.2 vide order dated 21.08.2025 without considering the material facts. After some arguements, ultimately a prayer has been made by learned counsel for the petitioner to direct the respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid appeal expeditiously. 2. This prayer has not been opposed by learned Standing Co

WRIT - C No. 1668 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam