Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-20

WRIT - C No. 1629 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1629 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1629 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 1629 of 2026 Vijay Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukul Yadav, Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State, Sri B. K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondent/respondents to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case respondent/respondents feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioners in the present petition is to direct the respondent no.2-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Machhali Shahar to decide the Case No.T202514360300395 expeditiously. 4. It is argued by counsel for the petitioners that though a considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matte

WRIT - C No. 1629 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam