Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-29

WRIT - C No. 1468 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1468 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1468 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 1468 of 2026 Savita Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar, Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C., Rajnath Yadav Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead Additional Commissioner, Prayagraj as respondent no.6 during course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State, Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and Sri Rajnath Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent no.5. 3. After some arguements counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer and argued that the Additional Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj, before whom statutory appeal filed by the respondent no.5 under sub-Section 4 of Section 24 of the Revenue Code, 2006 is pending and in the pending appeal filed by the respondent no.5, an application dated 09.01.2026 was filed by the petitioner, which is still pending consideration hence a prayer has been made to direct the respondent no.6 to decide the same expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for th

WRIT - C No. 1468 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam