Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-09

WRIT - C No. 130 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 130 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 130 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

A.F.R. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 130 of 2026 Shivdhari .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Shanker Tewari, Ajay Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri H. S. Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel on behalf of respondent No.s 1, 2 and 3 and Sri Govind Kumar Chaurasiya holding brief of Sri Mohan Singh on behalf of for opposite party No.4. 2. In light of the proposed order notice to private respondent No.5 is dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted that a housing lease was granted in favour of predecessor-in-interest of private respondent No.5 which was duly approved on 4.12.1991. The petitioner moved a complaint under Section 66 of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules of 2016) alleging that the private respondent has not constructed the house within three years of the grant of the said lease and, therefore, by operation of law as provided under Rule 64 of the Rules of 2016, the lease ought to be cancelled. 4. Notice

WRIT - C No. 130 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam