WRIT - C No. 1002800 of 2001 at Lucknow

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW A.F.R. WRIT - C No. - 1002800 of 2001 Prahlad Gond .....Petitioner(s) Versus U.P. Co-Operative Tribunal Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anuj Kudesia, Himanshu Shukla, Vikas Kumar Agrawal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kapil Muni Dubey, Rakesh Nigam, Sati Prasad Singh @ Satish Kumar Singh Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Divesh Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondent No.1 and Sri Satish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.5. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the orders dated 29.5.2001, passed by respondent No.1 in Appeal No.92 of 2006 and order dated 20.9.1996, passed by respondent No.2. 3. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned counsel for respondent No.5 that the co-operative society, which is running the bank, is a private society, therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In support of his submission, he placed reliance upon the following judgments :- (i) Krishna Mohan Vs. State of U.P. and others (Writ-A No.2329 of