Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-21

WRIT - B No. 94 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 94 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 94 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 94 of 2026 Vinod Sonkar And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, Neeraj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pankaj Kumar Gupta, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The instant petition has been filed for the following reliefs: "i. stay the effect and operation of the order dated 18.1.2021 passed by respondent no.4/ Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Mirzapur and entire proceedings thereto, during the pendency of the instant writ petition. ii. a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding / directing to respondent no.2 to decide the Revision No.388 of 2021 pending before him within stipulated period fix by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforementioned revision filed on behalf of petitioner arising out of proceeding under Section 31/32 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending before respondent no.,2/ Board of Revenue, U.P. at Allahabad since, 2021. He furt

WRIT - B No. 94 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam