Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-27

WRIT - B No. 92 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 92 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 92 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 92 of 2026 Raj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mangla Prasad Shukla, Naresh Kumar Pandey, Shiva Kant Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead- Gram Sabha concerned as respondent no.4 in the array of the parties to the instant writ petition during course of the day and serve the copy of the instant petition upon Mr. Azad Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4- Gram Sabha. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. T.P. Gupta, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Azad Rai, learned counsel for the respondent- Gaon Sabha. 3. The instant petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondent no.2 / Board of Revenue, U.P. at Prayagraj to decide the Second Appeal No.3979 of 2023, Computerized Case No.AL20230225003979, under Section 208 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the second appeal filed by the petitioner arising out of suit und

WRIT - B No. 92 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam