Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-22

WRIT - B No. 85 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 85 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 85 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 85 of 2026 Singhasan Gupta .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Dwivedi, Hari Om Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead board of revenue as respondent No.5 in the array of the parties to the instant writ petition during course of the day. 2. Heard Mr. Hari Om Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr.Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent No.4. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- “I. Issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing direct the learned Court concerned to decide the Revision No. 2613 of 2024 (Singhasan Gupta Vs. Sub Divisional Officer and others), which is pending before learned Court of Board of Revenue, U.P. at Allahabad, within an stipulated period, which is pending before the learned Court of Board of Revenue, U.P.

WRIT - B No. 85 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam