Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-22

WRIT - B No. 83 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 83 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 83 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 83 of 2026 Ram Sanehi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satya Priya Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and perused the record. 2. The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, with the following prayer:- A. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of the mandamus commanding the Respondent no. 2 to adjudicate and decide the case no. 28/2025, under Rule. 109 A(1) U.P.C.H. Rules (Ram Sanehi vs. State) Mauza-Madhopur, Tappa- Kewatli, Pargana-Haweli, Tahsil_Sadar, District- Gorakhpur is Pending Consideration before Consolidation Officer Rustampur, Gorakhpur (Respondent no. 2) Since 26.3.2025 Within the stipulate period fixed by this Hon'ble Court" 2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection in case a direction is issued for early disposal of the aforementioned matter. 3. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this

WRIT - B No. 83 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam