Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-30

WRIT - B No. 60 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 60 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 60 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 60 of 2026 Sunil .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 16 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Milan Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No.2, Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Jaunpur to decide the Appeal No. 610/2023 U/S 11 (1) of U. P. C. H. Act (Chandrabali and others Vs. Sunil and others) Village- Gajana, Pargana- Saremu, Tehsil- Sadar, District- Jaunpur, within stipulated time." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, as mentioned in the writ petition, with a direction to Respondent no.2 to decide

WRIT - B No. 60 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam