Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-30

WRIT - B No. 59 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 59 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 59 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 59 of 2026 Jooha Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devbratt Yadav, Ram Pratap Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Akash Yadav, learned counsel, holding the brief of Sri Ram Pratap Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the state-respondents and Sri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent-gaon sabha. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the Board of Revenue U.P. at Prayagraj to decide the stay application filed in Revision No. REV/85/2023 (Computer Case No.AL202315060085 (Jooha Devi v. State) under section 333 of U.P.Z.A and L.R. Act read with section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 in time frame without any further delay and till the stay application is decided the order sought to be challenged in revision may be stayed

WRIT - B No. 59 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam